The Mobility Credit Transfer and Accumulation System (MCTS): SEA-EU Alliance framework for reframing academic mobility in Europe

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.48188/so.7.16

Keywords:

mobility, Erasmus+, SEA-EU Alliance, European Higher Education Area (EHEA), acedemic recognition, internationalisation of higher education

Abstract

Aim: Mobility of students and staff in Europe is a cornerstone of the European Higher Education Area (EHEA) and one of the strategic priorities of the European Universities Initiative (EUI). However, while the European Credit Transfer and Accumulation System (ECTS) has successfully supported the recognition of formal academic learning, it does not fully capture the growing diversity of contemporary mobility experiences of different duration and type. Moreover, recognition remains a challenge for students at universities and is often lacking a comprehensive backbone recognition system even for academic and especially for administrative and technical staff.
Methods: To address this systemic gap, the European University of the Seas (SEA-EU) Alliance established a dedicated Task Force to develop the Mobility Credit Transfer and Accumulation System (MCTS), a complementary framework designed to recognise, quantify, accumulate, and incentivise diverse forms of mobility among students, teachers, and administrative and technical staff. This paper presents the framework, strategic benefits, conceptual design, scoring methodology and implementation potential of MCTS.
Results: The framework uses workload hours as a common denominator compatible with ECTS while applying greater granularity that enables recognition of smaller mobility units to include most of the internationalisation activities. It is a flexible framework that enables both differentiation of intensity of specific mobility activities by introducing the mobility specific weighting factors, similar to ECTS flexibility, but also enables recognition of extra mobility efforts for individual participants by introducing additional workload hours component to better reflect real engagement. MCTS may improve inclusivity, broaden participation, strengthen staff recognition, and provide more realistic institutional mobility analytics. Key challenges include standardised metrics, interoperability with institutional systems, stakeholder acceptance, and robust quality-assurance mechanisms that preserve academic standards and prevent credit inflation.
Conclusions: MCTS offers a scalable model for modernising mobility recognition across European university alliances and potentially across the wider European higher education landscape.

Published

2026-09-29

Most read articles by the same author(s)